Paviglianti
(PC) Cain v. Paviglianti
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20222:20-cv-01768California881 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO LAMONT CAIN, Case No. 2:20-cv-01768-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT AND
v. DENYING UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA’S MOTIONS FOR
B. PAVIGLIANTI1, CLARIFICATION AND FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME
Defendant. ECF Nos. 32, 33, 37
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE DENIED
18 ECF No. 35 19 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding without counsel in this Bivens action. The court previously screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint and found that it stated an Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendant Paviglianti. ECF No. 16. The U.S. Marshal
1 Plaintiff first amended complaint identified defendant as “B. Pauigliati.” ECF No. 13. Defendant has filed a waiver of service that explains that the correct spelling of his name is “B. 25 Paviglianti.” ECF No. 31 at 1. …