Foxworthy

(HC) Craig v. Foxworthy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20222:21-cv-01261California435 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, No. 2:21-cv-1261-JAM-EFB P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOXWORTHY, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner commenced this action while confined to a county jail as a pretrial detainee.1 ECF No. 1 at 2. He proceeds without counsel and seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 4, 2022, the court found that petitioner had failed to file an in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee ($5.00) required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) & 1915(a). ECF No. 7. Accordingly, the court ordered petitioner to file a completed in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee within 30 days. That order warned petitioner that failure to do so may result in this action being dismissed. ///// /////

1 Petitioner was later transferred to Napa State Hospital. The 30-day period has expired and petitioner has not filed a completed in forma pauperis 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.