Grantham

Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. Grantham

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20222:18-cv-02785California10,804 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS

CENTER; ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION INFORMATION No. 2:18-cv-02785-TLN-DMC CENTER; and KLAMATH FOREST

ALLIANCE,

ORDER Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 PATRICIA A. GRANTHAM, Klamath National Forest Supervisor, and UNITED

STATES FOREST SERVICE,

18 Defendants, 19 and

AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE

COUNCIL, an Oregon non-profit corporation, 22 Intervenor Defendant.

24 This matter is before the Court on three motions for summary judgment: (1) Klamath- Siskiyou Wildlands Center’s, Environmental Protection Information Center’s, and Klamath Forest Alliance’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 88); (2) Patricia A. Grantham’s and the United States Forest Service’s (collectively, “Federal Defendants”) Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 91); and (3) American Forest Resource Council’s (“Intervenor Defendant”) Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 92). For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.