Fisher

(PC) Grzeslo v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20221:21-cv-01371California8,177 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 JAMES GRZELSO, Case No. 1:21-cv-01371-JLT-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND RAYTHEL FISHER, JR., et al., SOLELY PLAINTIFF’S FREE EXERCISE CLAIM Defendants. (ECF No. 25)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS

17 Plaintiff James Grzeslo is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (ECF Nos. 1, 5, 16, 25). Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on September 14, 2021, raising Eighth Amendment, ADA, due- process, and retaliation claims. (ECF No. 1). On October 18, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it failed to state any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.