(PS) Nelson Rogers v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20222:21-cv-02151California4,071 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY ALICE NELSON ROGERS, et. al., No. 2:21-cv-2151-JAM-KJN (PS) Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS;

ANCILLARY ORDER

13 v. (ECF Nos. 6, 12, 14, 20.) 14 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On October 18, 2021, plaintiffs filed a complaint in California Superior Court alleging claims against defendants Washington Mutual Bank, Schools Financial Credit Union, JP Morgan Chase Bank, and Quality Loan Services Corp. (ECF No. 1-1 at 198-224.) Defendant Chase 20 removed to this court and moved to dismiss. (ECF Nos. 1, 6.) Plaintiff moved to remand the case, which defendants opposed. (ECF Nos. 14, 17, 23.) Shortly after, defendants Quality and SFCU entered and moved to dismiss. (ECF Nos. 14, 20.) Multiple parties requested judicial notice of certain documents, and plaintiff filed a motion to strike defendants’ affirmative defenses. (ECF Nos. 7, 11, 21, 25, 26.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends: (I) denying plaintiffs’ motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.