(SS) Carrasco v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20221:20-cv-01394California5,537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENARDO GATICA CARRASCO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01394-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

AFFIRM COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

v. SECURITY2

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY, (Doc. No. 19) Defendant.1 17 18 Plaintiff Bernardo Gatica Carrasco seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). This matter is currently before the undersigned on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 19, 20, 21). For the reasons stated, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the Commissioner’s decision be affirmed. 25 1 This action was originally filed against Andrew Saul in his capacity as the Commissioner of Social 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.