(SS) Carrasco v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENARDO GATICA CARRASCO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01394-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
AFFIRM COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
v. SECURITY2
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY, (Doc. No. 19) Defendant.1 17 18 Plaintiff Bernardo Gatica Carrasco seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). This matter is currently before the undersigned on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 19, 20, 21). For the reasons stated, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the Commissioner’s decision be affirmed. 25 1 This action was originally filed against Andrew Saul in his capacity as the Commissioner of Social 26 …