Alencastre

(PC) Khouanmany v. Alencastre

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20222:17-cv-01326California353 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY, Case No. 2:17-cv-01326-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO MODIFY THE SUPPLEMENTAL

v. SCHEDULING ORDER BEN ALENCASTRE, et al., ECF No. 172 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner alleging claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). She has filed a document that asks the court to extend all deadlines in this case. ECF No. 172. The court construes plaintiff’s filing as a motion to modify the supplemental discovery order to extend the deadlines for filing motions to compel discovery and dispositive motions. In their response to plaintiff’s filing, defendants state that they do not oppose extending those deadlines. ECF No. 173. Since defendants do not oppose plaintiff’s motion to modify the scheduling order, her motion will be granted. The court will also set a briefing scheduling on the two motions to compel that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.