Alencastre
(PC) Khouanmany v. Alencastre
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY, Case No. 2:17-cv-01326-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO MODIFY THE SUPPLEMENTAL
v. SCHEDULING ORDER BEN ALENCASTRE, et al., ECF No. 172 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner alleging claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). She has filed a document that asks the court to extend all deadlines in this case. ECF No. 172. The court construes plaintiff’s filing as a motion to modify the supplemental discovery order to extend the deadlines for filing motions to compel discovery and dispositive motions. In their response to plaintiff’s filing, defendants state that they do not oppose extending those deadlines. ECF No. 173. Since defendants do not oppose plaintiff’s motion to modify the scheduling order, her motion will be granted. The court will also set a briefing scheduling on the two motions to compel that…