Napear

Napear v. Bonneville Internat'l Corp.

Good Law

United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20222:21-cv-01956California6,629 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

David J. Jordan (UT #1751, admitted pro hac vice) Email: david.jordan@stoel.com R. Chad Pugh (UT #14035, admitted pro hac vice) Email: chad.pugh@stoel.com Tanner B. Camp (CA #321716) Email: tanner.camp@stoel.com STOEL RIVES LLP 201 S. Main Street, Suite 1100 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 328-3131 6 Bryan L. Hawkins (CA #238346) Email: bryan.hawkins@stoel.com

STOEL RIVES LLP

500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 447-0700 Attorneys for Defendant Bonneville International Corporation 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRANT NAPEAR,

No. 2:21-cv-01956-KJM-DB Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER V.

BONNEVILLE INTERNATIONAL

CORPORATION, a Utah corporation; and DOES through 50, inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER -l- 2:21-CV-01956-KJM-D.

Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.