(PC)Moya

(PC)Moya v. Chism

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20221:21-cv-01624California618 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RENE ANTHONY MOYA, ) Case No. 1:21-cv-01624-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW v. ) CAUSE, DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

B. CHISM, et al., ) THIS ACTION, AND FINDING AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING Defendants. ) DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS ) ) (ECF Nos. 7, 8) ) )

Plaintiff Rene Anthony Moya is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on November 8, 2021. On December 15, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable excessive force claim against Defendant VanNess and a cognizable failure to intervene claim against Defendant Putnam. (ECF No. 6.) However, Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim against Defendants Tolbert and Chism. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.