Parriot
(PC) Smith v. Parriot
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20221:19-cv-00286California8,302 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH, 1:19-cv-00286-JLT-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT
vs. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED,
PARRIOT, et al., WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO FILING A
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
Defendants. CORPUS
(ECF No. 47.)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS
20 I. BACKGROUND Lawrence Christopher Smith (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with the First Amended Complaint filed on September 10, 2020, against defendants Cantu,1 W. Gutierrez, and Mattingly (“Defendants”) for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 22.) 27 1 Sued as Canto. On September 15, 2021, Defendants filed a motion…