Hill

(HC) Witzig v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20221:22-cv-00155California835 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY JOSEPH WITZIG, Case No. 1:22-cv-00155-SKO (HC)

Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS SUCCESSIVE PETITION FOR

v. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

RICK HILL, Warden, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

Respondent. [TWENTY-ONE DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE]

17 On January 28, 2022, Petitioner filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus in this Court. Because the petition is successive, the Court will recommend it be DISMISSED. DISCUSSION Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases requires the Court to make a preliminary review of each petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Court must dismiss a petition "[i]f it plainly appears from the petition . . . that the petitioner is not entitled to relief." Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; see also Hendricks v. Vasquez, 908 F.2d 490, 491 (9th Cir. 1990). A petition for habeas corpus should not be dismissed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.