Henderson v. Bakersfield Police Department
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20221:21-cv-01771California5,105 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OCTAVIO JAMAL HENDERSON, Case No. 21-cv-01771-DAD-BAK
Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AN
v. AMENDED COMPLAINT
BAKERSFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, (ECF No. 1)
Defendant. THIRTY DAY DEADLINE
16 Octavio Jamal Henderson (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on December 15, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Notwithstanding any filing fee, the court shall dismiss a case if at any time the Court determines that the complaint “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (section 1915(e) applies to all in forma pauperis…