(PC) Ruiz v. Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2:20-CV-2025-TLN-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS J. CURRY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. On November 8, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. On December 29, 2021, the Court sua sponte granted Plaintiff a 30-day extension of time. To date, Plaintiff has not complied. The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). Those factors are: (1) the public's interest in expeditious resolution of…