(PS) Johnson v. Lake Shastina Police Dept

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20222:19-cv-01193California329 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 POLLY JOHNSON, No. 2:19-CV-1193-MCE-DMC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LAKE SHASTINA POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss as terminating sanctions, ECF No. 21. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. Defendants argue that this action should be dismissed as an appropriate sanction for Plaintiff’s failure to obey this Court’s order to appear for a deposition. See ECF No. 21-1. Defendants also seek an award of reasonable fees in the amount of $1,200.00. See ECF No. 21-2. Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(c), the Court construes Plaintiff’s failure to file an opposition to Defendants’ motion as consent to the relief requested. / / / / / / / / / Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that: 1. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.