Pfitzer

(PC) Medley v. Pfitzer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20222:22-cv-00227California1,999 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THEODORA MEDLEY, No. 2:22-cv-00227 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER S. PFITZER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Theodora Medley is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 3, 2022, this case was transferred to this court from the United States District Court for the Central District of California by order of Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (ECF No. 64.) Presently before the court is defendants’ motion for the court to screen plaintiff’s complaint and for extension of time for file responsive pleading. (ECF No. 67.) Additionally, plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (ECF No. 10) and Supplemental Pleadings (ECF No. 60) are before the court for screening. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion (ECF No. 67) will be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.