Kirsch

(PC) Krenitsky v. Kirsch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20222:18-cv-00690California6,385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLAN DAVID KRENITSKY, No. 2:18-cv-0690 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

KIRSCH, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment when their failure to treat an eye infection resulted in the loss of his eye. On January 28, 2022, this court held a hearing using Zoom videoconferencing on defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Attorney Greg Mullanax appeared for plaintiff. Attorney Martin Kosla appeared for defendant Kirsch. Deputy Attorney General John Bridges appeared for defendants Jackson and Martinez. After considering the parties’ briefs, the record, and the arguments of counsel, this court will recommend defendants’ motions for summary judgment be denied. //// …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.