Santoro

(PC) Hardy v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20221:21-cv-00327California707 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 KRISTIN HARDY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00327-DAD-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO v. AMEND

R. MORENO, et al., (ECF No. 41)

13 Defendants. SCREENING ORDER

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

DOCKET LODGED SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 35)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

SERVE COPY OF THIS ORDER AND

COPY OF LODGED SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 35)

ON DEFENDANT CEBALLOS

19 Kristin Hardy (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 16, 2021, District Judge Dale A. Drozd found that Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) should proceed on Plaintiff’s unreasonable search and seizure claims against defendants Valencia, Moreno, Chavez, Dohs, and Ceballos, based on Plaintiff’s allegations that after he was subjected to a full body scan,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.