Betancourt

Betancourt v. Total Property Management

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20221:22-cv-00033California442 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CESAR A. BETANCOURT, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-0033 JLT EPG ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING v. ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA ) PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO TOTAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, ) PAY THE FILING FEE ) Defendant. ) (Docs. 2, 3) ) )

Cesar Betancourt seeks to hold Total Property Management liable for violating the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act. On January 7, 2022, Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a complaint with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docs. 1, 2.) On January 12, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge found the information provided by Plaintiff with his application indicated Plaintiff could afford to pay the Court’s filing fee. (Doc. 4 at 1.) Thus, the magistrate judge recommended Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied without prejudice, and the Court direct…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.