Zavala

Zavala v. Reigosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20221:21-cv-01631California3,715 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO ZAVALA, Case No. 1:21-cv-01631-NONE-SKO Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: SALVADOR REIGOSA, et al., (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; OR Defendants. (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES TO STAND ON HIS

COMPLAINT

17 (Doc. 1)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (Doc. 3) 22 23 Plaintiff Antonio Zavala is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff 24 filed his complaint on November 8, 2021. (Doc. 1). Upon review, the Court concludes that the 25 complaint fails to state any cognizable claims. 26 Plaintiff has the following options as to how to proceed. Plaintiff may file an amended 27 complaint, which the Court will screen in due course. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a statement 28 with the Court stating that he wants to stand on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.