Zepp
(PC) Turner v. Zepp
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VINCENT TURNER, Case No. 1:20-cv-00184-AWI-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ANDREW ZEPP, et al. (ECF No. 90) Defendants.
Plaintiff Vincent Turner is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 3, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. (ECF No. 90.) Plaintiff’s motion states:
Motion request for an attorney on grounds I am under the American’s Disability act. I have a reading and spelling disability. Enclosed is evidence stating my tabe score. I am requesting a lawyer or for the ongoing upcoming issues be addressed by conversation over the phone. If I don’t respone to any of the Defendants issues I’m sure it shouldn’t be a problem. It’s been done many of times by Dr. Khaled A. Tawansy and his case…