Palagummi

(PC) Taylor v. Palagummi

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20222:19-cv-02375California338 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BERNARD GLEN TAYLOR, No. 2:19-CV-2375-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS S. PALAGUMMI, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status, ECF No. 32. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. Defendant argues that the Court should dismiss this action without prejudice to re- filing upon pre-payment of the filing fees because Plaintiff is not entitled to in forma pauperis status under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See ECF No. 32-1. Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(c), the Court construes Plaintiff’s failure to file an opposition to Defendant’s motion as consent to the relief requested. / / / / / / / / / / / Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that: …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.