Kalil

(PC) Lipsey v. Kalil

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20222:17-cv-01429California2,910 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR., No. 2:17-cv-1429 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. KALIL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 27, 2021, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment based on plaintiff’s alleged failure to exhaust administrative remedies and a motion to stay discovery. ECF Nos. 49, 50. The motion to stay discovery was granted, except to the extent that plaintiff could seek to compel responses to discovery related to the exhaustion of his administrative remedies. ECF No. 51. Plaintiff ultimately filed a motion to compel and for sanctions in which he stated he was seeking to compel responses to Interrogatories 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 21, and 22, which related to exhaustion. ECF No. 58. As a result, briefing on the motion for summary judgment was stayed and defendants were ordered to respond to the motion to compel. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.