Phui

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KELLY DAVIS, Case No. 1:20-CV-00276-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MISCELLANEOUS MOTION

v. (Doc. No. 30) DR. PHUI, ET. AL., Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s letter addressed to the Court. (Doc. No. 30). The Federal Rules dictate the appropriate type of pleadings, including how motions are to be filed with the court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b). Letters addressed to the court do not qualify as a motion. Indeed, this Court’s Local Rules provide that “[n]o petition or motion shall be addressed to an individual Judge or Magistrate Judge.” Local Rule 190(c). In the future, Plaintiff is warned that any future letter addressed to the Court will be returned without filing. Plaintiff states he is undergoing medical procedures at the hospital in San Diego and requests that the Court direct correctional officials not to transfer him to a different prison. (See generally Doc. No. 30). Liberally construed,…