Webb

Webb v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20221:19-cv-01716California4,430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAYLOR WEBB, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-01716-DAD-EPG Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF TAYLOR

v. WEBB’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER

DISCOVERY

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., (ECF Nos. 71, 78) Defendants.

16 Before the Court is Plaintiff Taylor Webb’s (“Plaintiff Webb”) motion to compel Defendant County of Stanislaus (the “County”) to produce documents responsive to Plaintiff Webb’s second set of requests for production and for an award of expenses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37. (ECF Nos. 71, 78.) For the following reasons, the Court grants Plaintiff Webb’s motion in part and denies it in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Webb, Jeremy Westfall, A.W., and Donnie Cox as guardian ad litem for A.W. (“Plaintiffs”) brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the County, April Cobbs, Lawrence Jones, Patricia Tout, Eric Anderson (“Defendants”), and the City of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.