Frauenheim

(HC) Vasquez v. Frauenheim

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20222:17-cv-02579California293 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SALVADOR B. VASQUEZ, No. 2:17-cv-2579 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER and FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Respondents. 16 By order filed January 6, 2022, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within thirty days, why this action should not be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and petitioner has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this case. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.