(PS)Romero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIE PAMELA ROMERO and No. 2:21-cv-2236 TLN DB PS

MARLITO ROMERO,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER AND v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

MONTEREY FINANCIAL SERVICES,

LLC, 16 Defendant.

18 Plaintiffs Marie Pamela Romero and Marlito Romero are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On December 10, 2021, defendant noticed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for hearing before the undersigned. (ECF No. 24.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c) plaintiffs were to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to defendant’s motion “not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed . . . hearing date.” Plaintiffs, however, failed to file a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition. Accordingly, on January 11, 2022, the court issued an order to show cause, ordering plaintiffs to show cause in writing within fourteen…