(PC)Hill

(PC)Hill v. Green

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20222:21-cv-02077California579 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CYMEYON V. HILL, No. 2:21-CV-2077-WBS-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GREEN, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Final judgment was entered on January 5, 2022, and this action is closed. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 18, for reconsideration of the Court’s January 5, 2022, order and final judgment. The Court may grant reconsideration under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60. Generally, a motion for reconsideration of a final judgment is appropriately brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See Backlund v. Barnhart, 778 F.2d 1386, 1388 (9th Cir. 1985) (discussing reconsideration of summary judgment); see also Schroeder v. McDonald, 55 F.3d 454, 458-59 (9th Cir. 1995). The motion must be filed no later than twenty-eight (28) days after entry of the judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.