Matteson
(HC) Inprasit v. Matteson
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20222:20-cv-00643California20,408 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:20-cv-00643-WBS-KJN Document 12 Filed 02/15/22 Page 1 of
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ARTHUR INPRASIT aka ARTHUR NOP No. 2:20-cv-00643 WBS KJN P
LEW,
12 Petitioner, FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS v.
GISELLE MATTESON,
15 Respondent.
I. Introduction
Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with an application for a writ of
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges his August 23, 2016,
conviction for assault with a deadly weapon. (ECF No. 10-3 at 143-44, 146.) On October 6,
2016, petitioner was sentenced to 14 years in state prison. (Id. at 207-08.) Petitioner makes six
claims in his habeas petition: (1) there was insufficient evidence to convict; (2) the state appellate
court improperly upheld a “verdict” not rendered by the jury; (3) a due process violation and
ineffective assistance of counsel based on defendant’s lack of knowledge that his conviction
would…