Warren

(HC) Barnes v. Warren

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20222:21-cv-02061California790 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, No. 2:21-CV-2061-TLN-DMC-P Petitioner,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. WARREN, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1. Rule 4 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases provides for summary dismissal of a habeas petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” In the instant case, it is plain that Petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas relief. In his petition, Petitioner challenges the conditions of his confinement at Mule Creek State Prison. See ECF No. 1. When a state prisoner challenges the legality of his custody – either the fact of confinement or the duration of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.