Covello

(HC) Cornejo v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20222:20-cv-01124California303 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM CORNEJO, No. 2:20-CV-1124-KJM-DMC-P Petitioner,

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

PATRICK COVELLO, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 9. Petitioner has not filed an opposition. Respondent argues that the instant petition must be dismissed because it was filed beyond the one-year statue of limitations. See ECF No. 9-1. Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(c), the Court construes Petitioner’s failure to file an opposition to Respondent’s motion as consent to the relief requested. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that Respondent’s 2 || unopposed motion to dismiss, ECF No. 9, be granted. These findings and recommendations are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.