Stringer

(PC) Thomas v. Stringer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20221:22-cv-00174California457 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 FLOYD ROBERT THOMAS, 1:22-cv-00174-GSA-PC

ORDER FOR CLERK TO RANDOMLY

Plaintiff, ASSIGN A UNITED STATES DISTRICT

JUDGE TO THIS CASE

vs.

AND

B. STRINGER,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

Defendant. RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS BE DENIED (ECF No. 2.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS

20 I. FINDINGS Floyd Robert Thomas (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 10, 2022, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action, together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) In his declaration in support of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dated February 8, 2022, Plaintiff reports that he received $3,200.00 in Covid-19 federal relief in the last twelve months, of which approximately $400.00 remains. (ECF No. 2 at 2.) Plaintiff’s prison trust 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.