Stringer
(PC) Thomas v. Stringer
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20221:22-cv-00174California457 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 FLOYD ROBERT THOMAS, 1:22-cv-00174-GSA-PC
ORDER FOR CLERK TO RANDOMLY
Plaintiff, ASSIGN A UNITED STATES DISTRICT
JUDGE TO THIS CASE
vs.
AND
B. STRINGER,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
Defendant. RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS BE DENIED (ECF No. 2.)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS
20 I. FINDINGS Floyd Robert Thomas (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 10, 2022, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action, together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) In his declaration in support of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dated February 8, 2022, Plaintiff reports that he received $3,200.00 in Covid-19 federal relief in the last twelve months, of which approximately $400.00 remains. (ECF No. 2 at 2.) Plaintiff’s prison trust 1…