(PC) Kamilchu v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20222:21-cv-02245California702 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDUARD KAMILCHU, No. 2:21-cv-2245 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 28, 2021, the court ordered plaintiff to pay the filing fee for this action or submit a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff has since submitted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has also requested a ruling on this motion. (ECF No. 9.) The court has received plaintiff’s motion and will rule on it in due course. As such, plaintiff’s motion will be granted. Additionally, plaintiff’s complaint is also presently before the court for screening. (ECF No. 1.) The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.