James Blankinship v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 14 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES BLANKINSHIP, No. 22-16849
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-00072-RM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,
a Delaware Corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 14, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS, HAMILTON,** and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. This appeal is controlled by our opinion issued today in DeFries v. Union
Pacific Railroad Co., __F.4th __, No. 23-35119 (9th Cir. June 14, 2024). Like
plaintiff DeFries, plaintiff-appellant James Blankinship worked as a conductor for
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable David F. Hamilton, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation. defendant-appellee Union Pacific…