Costco

Photofixitpro, Inc. v. Costco

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 202423-55548California450 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 14 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PHOTOFIXITPRO, INC., No. 23-55548

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-08955-PA-MAA v.

MEMORANDUM*

COSTCO WHOLESALE

CORPORATION,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 10, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, CHRISTEN, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Appellant PhotoFixItPro, Inc. (PFP) appeals from the district court’s order

granting Appellee Costco Wholesale Corporation’s (Costco) Motion to Confirm the

Arbitration Award. While we generally have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1332, because PFP’s notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss for lack of

jurisdiction.

Subject…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.