People v. Singh CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 14, 2024C099583California1,870 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/14/24 P. v. Singh CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C099583

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 23FE000947)

v.

RAGHVENDRA SINGH,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury convicted defendant Raghvendra Singh of filing a fraudulent or forged document, namely a proof of service attached to a motion. On appeal, defendant contends that the jury lacked sufficient evidence to find him guilty of violating Penal Code1 section 115 because the proof of service could not be legally filed. Specifically, defendant claims the proof of service could not be legally filed because he lacked

Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. standing to file the motion,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.