Romero-Campos

facts that will be proven at a hearing to be held if the motion is granted.” But the statute cited describes the contents of a motion to reopen, not an exception for untimely motions. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(B). Second, he argues that the deadline does not apply if the motion is accompanied by an application for cancellation of removal. But the statute cited describes a requirement under the special rule for survivors of domestic abuse, and there is nothing in the record suggesting that Romero-Campos would qualify for this exception. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(iv)(II).

23-2815 violation when before the BIA he only argued that the defective NTA deprived the

immigration judge of jurisdiction).

DENIED.

23-2815