Singh

Singh v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 202423-1065California952 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 17 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SUKHWINDER SINGH, No. 23-1065 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-203-444 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 13, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, TALLMAN, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Sukhwinder Singh petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) affirmance of a decision by an immigration judge (“IJ”) denying his

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Against Torture (“CAT”), and ordering his deportation to India. Singh contends

that the agency violated his Fifth Amendment due process rights because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.