Sathre
Sathre v. Davis CA2/7
Opinion
Opinion
Segal, J.
INTRODUCTION
In 2012 Jaimie Davis lost an arbitration she filed against her former investment advisor, Curtis J. Sathre III, and his company to recover losses she incurred in risky investments. The judgment confirming the arbitration award included an award against Davis of over $135,000 in costs and expert fees, an award Davis has never paid. As the 10-year anniversary of the judgment approached, Sathre filed a renewal of judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 683.110,1 and the court ordered the judgment renewed. Davis appeals from the trial court’s orders denying her motions to vacate the renewal of judgment and an amended renewal of judgment. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Sathre and Others Obtain an Arbitration Award of Costs and Fees Against Davis, the Trial Court Confirms the Award, and We Affirm In 2010 Davis filed a statement of claim against WFP Securities, Inc., an independent broker-dealer and licensed member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA);2 John Schooler, WFP Securities’ president; and Sathre,
Undesignated statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure.