People v. Mitchell CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 17, 2024B329199California741 words

Opinion

Opinion

Discussion “California’s youth offender parole statute offers opportunities for early release to certain persons who are incarcerated for crimes they committed at a young age. [Citations.] . . . Under the current version of the statute, most persons incarcerated for a crime committed between ages 18 and 25 are entitled to a parole hearing during the 15th, 20th, or 25th year of their incarceration. [Citation]. But not all youthful offenders are eligible for parole hearings. The statute excludes, among others, offenders who are serving sentences of life in prison without the possibility of parole for a crime committed after the age of 18. ([§ 3051,] subd. (h).)” (People v. Hardin (2024) 15 Cal.5th 834, 838-839 (Hardin).) Appellant contends section 3051, subdivision (h) violates equal protection under the federal and state constitutions by denying a parole hearing to youthful offenders, like appellant, who have been sentenced to LWOP. He makes a number of arguments in support of this contention, including that relative culpability is not a rational basis for excluding some youthful offenders from entitlement to a parole hearing. Appellant relies on People v. Hardin (2022) 84…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.