Maria Rosengren v. Sf Markets, LLC
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 18, 202423-55666California770 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 18 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA ROSENGREN, No. 23-55666
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00848-RSWL-PD v. MEMORANDUM*
SF MARKETS, LLC,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Phillip S. Gutierez, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 14, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: W. FLETCHER, CHRISTEN, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Appellant Maria Rosengren appeals the denial of a motion for reconsideration
under Rule 60(b). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
A district court’s denial of a motion under Rule 60(b) is reviewed for abuse
of discretion. Latshaw v. Trainer Wortham & Co., 452 F.3d 1097, 1100 (9th Cir.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See…