Maria Rosengren v. Sf Markets, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 18, 202423-55666California770 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 18 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA ROSENGREN, No. 23-55666

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00848-RSWL-PD v. MEMORANDUM*

SF MARKETS, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Phillip S. Gutierez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 14, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, CHRISTEN, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Maria Rosengren appeals the denial of a motion for reconsideration

under Rule 60(b). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

A district court’s denial of a motion under Rule 60(b) is reviewed for abuse

of discretion. Latshaw v. Trainer Wortham & Co., 452 F.3d 1097, 1100 (9th Cir.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.