Linares Ramos v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 18, 202423-119California679 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 18 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IRIS LINARES RAMOS; ROSSELYN No. 23-119 SOLORZANO LINARES, Agency Nos.

A215-703-919

Petitioners, A215-703-920 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 15, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: COLLINS, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Iris Linares Ramos and her minor daughter petition for review of an order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming a decision by an Immigration

Judge (“IJ”) denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.