Guerrero-Espinosa

Guerrero-Espinosa v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 18, 202423-884California591 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 18 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIO GUERRERO-ESPINOSA, No. 23-884 Agency No. Petitioner, A200-551-474 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 14, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, TALLMAN, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges

Antonio Guerrero-Espinosa (“Petitioner” or “Guerrero-Espinosa”), a native

and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

decision upholding an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). Guerrero-Espinosa argued

before the agency that he met all of the statutory requirements for cancellation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.