Bayardo Sandoval v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 18, 202423-1443California783 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 18 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUILLERMO BAYARDO No. 23-1443 SANDOVAL; ALBERTA HERNANDEZ, Agency Nos.

A095-304-031

Petitioners, A095-304-032 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 13, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and CHRISTEN and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Guillermo Bayardo Sandoval and Alberta Hernandez, natives and

citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. Because the parties are familiar

with the facts, we do not recount them here. We have jurisdiction pursuant to

8 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.