Bayardo Sandoval v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 18, 202423-1443California783 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 18 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GUILLERMO BAYARDO No. 23-1443 SANDOVAL; ALBERTA HERNANDEZ, Agency Nos.
A095-304-031
Petitioners, A095-304-032 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 13, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and CHRISTEN and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners Guillermo Bayardo Sandoval and Alberta Hernandez, natives and
citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. Because the parties are familiar
with the facts, we do not recount them here. We have jurisdiction pursuant to