Amador Alfaro v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 18, 202423-813California806 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 18 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ELEAQUIN AMADOR ALFARO, No. 23-813 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-516-557 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 14, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, TALLMAN, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Jose Eleaquin Amador Alfaro (“Amador”) petitions for review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirmance of an oral decision by an immigration

judge (“IJ”) denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and ordering his removal to

Honduras. Amador challenges the agency’s adverse credibility determination,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.