Amador Alfaro v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 18, 202423-813California806 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 18 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE ELEAQUIN AMADOR ALFARO, No. 23-813 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-516-557 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 14, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: GOULD, TALLMAN, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Jose Eleaquin Amador Alfaro (“Amador”) petitions for review of a Board of
Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirmance of an oral decision by an immigration
judge (“IJ”) denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and ordering his removal to