Soltero

Soltero v. Precise Distribution

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 18, 2024D083308California4,166 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/18/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

NELIDA SOLTERO, D083308

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. CIVSB2203669)

PRECISE DISTRIBUTION, INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, David Cohn, Judge. Affirmed. OZ Law Group, Greg Ozhekim, and Susan K. Laffer for Defendant and Appellant. Gonzalez Weerasuriya and Suren N. Weerasuriya for Plaintiff and Respondent. Precise Distribution, Inc. (Precise) appeals from an order denying its motion to compel arbitration of an employment action brought against it by Nelida Soltero, who previously worked in a Precise distribution warehouse. Precise argues the trial court should have compelled arbitration under the terms of an arbitration agreement between Soltero and Real Time Staffing Services, LLC (Real Time), a temporary staffing agency that placed Soltero with Precise as a temporary worker. Real Time itself is not a party to the lawsuit. We conclude that the trial court correctly denied Precise’s motion because it was not a party to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.