People v. Quillope CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 18, 2024D081306California6,383 words

Opinion

Opinion

I.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Quillope and C.J. began dating in February 2019, and in November 2019 they were living together. C.J. told a law enforcement officer and a forensic nurse examiner that, on November 17, 2019, Quillope sexually

Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to the Penal Code. 2 assaulted her and punched her in the head after she told him that she was leaving him. Specifically, C.J. reported that, against her will, Quillope trapped her in the bathroom where he digitally penetrated her, penetrated her vagina and anus with his penis, and forced her to orally copulate him. Quillope then punched C.J. in the head several times before allowing her to leave the apartment. Quillope was charged with forcible rape (§ 261, subd. (a)(2); count 1); forcible sodomy (§ 286, subd. (c)(2)(A); count 2); forcible oral copulation (§ 287, subd. (c)(2)(A); count 3); forcible sexual penetration (§ 289, subd. (a)(1)(A); count 4); inflicting corporal injury on a spouse/cohabitant, with a previous conviction of that offense in the last seven years (§ 273.5, subds. (a), (f)(1); count 5); and false imprisonment by violence, menace, fraud, or deceit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.