People v. Scott CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 18, 2024A165540California8,511 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/18/24 P. v. Scott CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A165540

v. RICHARD SCOTT, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. 21CR012387) Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Richard Scott was convicted by a jury of three counts of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211).1 On appeal, defendant contends: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to represent himself; (2) the court failed to obtain a personal and express waiver of his right to a jury trial on the aggravating circumstances; and (3) his trial attorney was ineffective in failing to object to the court’s findings regarding aggravating and mitigating circumstances. We affirm.

All further undesignated statutory references are to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.