Turo Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20192:18-cv-06055California5,213 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 11 TURO INC., Case No. 2:18-CV-6055-CAS-GJS Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE v.

ORDER1

CITY OF LOS ANGELES,

Defendant.

18 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order (hereafter, “Order,” “Protective Order,” or “Stipulated Protective Order”). The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the 27 protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.