Freddy Curiel v. Kathleen Allison, Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20198:10-cv-00301California1,737 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FREDDY CURIEL, CASE NO. CV 10-0301 DDP (AS) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, v. CONCLUSIONS AND KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden, RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED Respondent. STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 Pursuant to U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. However, the Court addresses certain arguments raised in the Objections below. 25 Petitioner contends that the Report and Recommendation failed to conduct an appropriate analysis with regards to Petitioner’s ineffective assistance claim. (Objections at 1-2). In Ground One, Petitioner asserts that …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.