Jose J Gonsalez v. Employment Development Department EDD

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20192:18-cv-08607California1,154 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 JOSE J. GONSALEZ, Case No. 2:18-cv-08607 AB (ADS)

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES

EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DISMISSING DEPARTMENT EDD, et al., CASE 15 Defendants. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, including the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) dated December 26, 2018 [Dkt. No. 22], Plaintiff’s Objections to the R&R (“Objections”) [Dkt. No. 23], and the Declaration in Support of Objections (“Declaration”) [Dkt. No. 24], and has made a de novo determination of those portions to which Plaintiff objected. Nothing in the Objections refutes the Magistrate Judge’s finding that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the Complaint in its entirety. See [Dkt. No. 22, p. 18]. As the R&R explained, the Tax Injunction Act (“TIA”) prohibits Plaintiff’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.